ROUTE MAP OF INDIVIDUAL (GROUP) PROJECT STUDENTS OF THE 9th CLASS OF MAOU "GYMNASIUM No. 57"

Student’s full name __________________________________________________________ Grade ____________________________________________________________ Project topic _____________________________________________________ Individual/group ______________________________________________ Name of the project manager _______________________________________________ Evaluation criteria Below the baseline (mark “1”, “2” Basic level (mark “3” Above the base level (mark “4” and “5”) Final mark / grade Project Manager Expert Commission Project Manager Expert Commission Project Manager Expert Commission Ability to independently acquire knowledge and solve problems The work as a whole indicates a low ability to independently pose a problem and find ways to solve it; the ability to acquire new knowledge and / or master new ways of acting, to achieve a deeper understanding of what has been learned has not been demonstrated. A project not prepared for defense is rated “1” or “2”. The work as a whole testifies to the ability to independently, with the help of the leader, pose a problem and find ways to solve it; demonstrated the ability to acquire new knowledge and / or master new ways of acting, to achieve a deeper understanding of what has been learned. The work as a whole testifies to the ability to independently pose a problem and find ways to solve it; demonstrated good command of logical operations, critical thinking skills, ability to think independently; demonstrated the ability on this basis to acquire new knowledge and / or master new ways of acting, to achieve a deeper understanding of the problem. This level is assessed with a mark of “4” The work indicates the ability to independently pose a problem and find ways to solve it; demonstrated fluency in logical operations, critical thinking skills, the ability to think independently; demonstrated an increased ability on this basis to acquire new knowledge and / or master new ways of acting, to achieve a deeper understanding of the problem. This level is rated “5”. mark Formation of subject knowledge and methods of action The student does not understand the content of the work performed. Gross errors are observed in the work and in responses to surveys on the content of the work. A project not prepared for defense is rated “1” or “2”. Demonstrated understanding of the content of the work performed. There are no gross errors in the work and in answers to questions on the content of the work. This level is assessed with a mark of “3”. Demonstrated good knowledge of the subject of project activities. There are minor errors. This level is assessed with a mark of “4” Demonstrated fluency in the subject of project activities. There are no errors. This level is rated “5”. mark Formation of regulatory actions At a low level, the skills of determining the topic and planning the work were demonstrated. The work was not brought to completion and presented to the commission in an unfinished form; most of the stages were carried out under the supervision and support of the manager. There are no elements of self-assessment and self-control of the student. A project not prepared for defense is rated “1” or “2”. The skills of determining the topic and planning the work are demonstrated. The work was completed and presented to the commission; some stages were carried out under the control and with the support of the leader. At the same time, individual elements of self-esteem and self-control of the student are manifested. This level is rated “3”. The work was well planned and consistently implemented, most of the stages of discussion and presentation were completed in a timely manner. Control and correction were carried out with the help of the project manager. This level is rated “4”. The work was carefully planned and consistently implemented, all the necessary stages of discussing the presentation were passed in a timely manner. Control and correction were carried out independently. This level is rated “5”. mark Formation of communicative actions At a low level, the skills of designing a project work and an explanatory note, as well as preparing a simple presentation, were demonstrated. A project not prepared for defense is rated “1” or “2”. The skills of designing a project work and an explanatory note, as well as preparing a simple presentation, were demonstrated. This level is rated “3”. The topic is sufficiently fully disclosed. The text/message is structured. The main ideas are expressed clearly, logically, consistently, and reasonably. The work is interesting. This level is rated “4”. The topic is fully covered. The text/message is well structured. All thoughts are expressed clearly, logically, consistently, and reasonably. mark FINAL MARK / ASSESSMENT

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.