Criteria for assessing the quality of the presentation

Standards for assessing the quality of homework on the course “Age Physiology” for students of group 221 for 2012-2013 academic year

Abstract of scientific article (0-2 points).

The time allotted for the task is 1 hour.

Annotation (from Latin annotatio – remark) – a brief description of the content of a printed work or manuscript, is an extremely concise descriptive description of the original source. It summarizes the subject matter of the publication without fully disclosing its content.

Structure.

1. Before the text of the abstract, output data (author, title, place and time of publication) are given in nominative form.

2. The first part of the abstract formulates the main theme of the book or article.

3. The second part lists (names) the main provisions.

The subject of the action in the annotation is usually not named, because it is clear, known from the context; passive constructions (verbal and participial) are actively used.

Criteria for assessing the quality of writing an abstract of an article from a scientific journal.

0 points – the student did not write an abstract

1 point – the student wrote an abstract, but it did not fully reveal the main topic of the article. The logic of the presentation of the material is violated, the main provisions of the article are not fully reflected in the abstract or are completely omitted.

2 points – the abstract fully complies with the design standards, reveals the topic and main idea of the original source. There are no stylistic errors in the text.

Presentation (0-3 points)

The time allotted for the task is 1 hour.

Multimedia presentation (from lat. praesentatio ) is an information tool that allows you to provide the necessary information about the presentation object in a form convenient for the recipient.

Criteria for assessing the quality of the presentation

Presentation evaluation (points) Presentation Evaluation Criteria
Design and multimedia effects Content
1. Background color doesn’t match text color 1. The content is not scientific
2. More than 5 font colors used 2. Illustrations (graphic, musical, video) do not match the text
3. Each page has its own design style. 3. Lots of spelling, punctuation, stylistic mistakes
4. Hyperlinks are not highlighted 4. Numerical datasets are not illustrated with graphs and charts
5. No animation (or the presentation is overloaded with animation) 5. Information does not appear relevant and up-to-date
6. Sound background does not correspond to a single concept, is distracting 6. Key words in the text are not highlighted
7. Too small font (respectively, the amount of information is too large – the frame is overloaded)
8. Individual links don’t work
1. Background color doesn’t match text color well 1. Content includes scientific elements
2. More than 4 font colors used 2. Illustrations (graphic, musical, video) in certain cases correspond to the text
3. Some pages have their own design style. 3. There are spelling, punctuation, stylistic errors
4. Hyperlinks Highlighted 4. Numerical datasets are most often illustrated with graphs and charts
5. Animation is dosed 5. Information is up-to-date and up-to-date
6. The sound background does not correspond to a single concept, but is not distracting 6. Key words in the text are most often highlighted
7. The font size is medium (accordingly, the amount of information is too large – the frame is somewhat overloaded) with information
8. Links work
1. The background color matches the text color well, everything can be read 1. The content is generally scientific
2. Used 3 font colors 2. Illustrations (graphic, musical, video) match the text
3. 1-2 pages have their own design style, different from the general one 3. Spelling, punctuation, stylistic errors are practically absent
4. Hyperlinks are highlighted and have a different look before and after visiting the frame 4. Numerical data sets illustrated with graphs and charts
5. Animation is present only in those places where it is appropriate 5. Information is up-to-date and up-to-date
6. Sound background corresponds to a single concept and draws the attention of viewers to the information in the right places 6. Key words in the text are highlighted
7. Font size is optimal.
8. All links work
1. The background color is in harmony with the text color, everything is perfectly readable 1. Content is strictly scientific
2. Used 3 font colors 2. Illustrations (graphic, musical, video) enhance the effect of perception of the text part of the information
3. All pages are designed in the same style 3. There are no spelling, punctuation, stylistic errors
4. Hyperlinks are highlighted and have a different look before and after visiting the frame 4. Numerical data sets are illustrated with graphs and charts, and in the most appropriate form.
5. Animation is present only in those places where it is appropriate and enhances the effect of perception of the text part of the information 5. Information is up-to-date and up-to-date
6. The sound background corresponds to a single concept and enhances the effect of perception of the text part of the information 6. Key words in the text are highlighted
7. Font size is optimal
8. All links work

Essay writing

(without protection 0-2 points; with protection 0-3 points)

The time allotted for the task: writing an essay without protection – 2 hours;

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.