AUTONOMOUS NON-PROFIT VOCATIONAL EDUCATION ORGANIZATION

“HUMANITARIAN AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE “KNOWLEDGE”

Code and name of the specialty _________________________

FINAL QUALIFICATION WORK

Student
(Full Name ) (signature)
Supervisor
(Full Name) (signature)

Podolsk

201____

Appendix 3

Autonomous non-profit professional education organization

“Humanitarian and technical college “Knowledge”

EXERCISE

for the final qualifying work of the student

_____________________________________________________________________________

(code and name of the specialty, full name of the student)

1. WRC theme:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. WRC structure:

Introduction

Chapter 1.

1.1.

1.2.

1.3.

Chapter 2

2.1.

2.2.

2.3.

Conclusion

List of used literature

Applications

3. Main questions to be developed.

In the introduction , it is recommended to substantiate the relevance of the chosen topic, formulate the goals and objectives of the work, describe the object, subject and information base of the study.

To write chapter 1 , it is recommended to study the main and additional literature on the chosen topic.

In paragraph 1.1 it is necessary

In paragraph 1.2 it is necessary

In paragraph 1.3 it is necessary

Chapter 2 should…

In paragraph 2.1 it is necessary

In paragraph 2.2 it is necessary

In paragraph 2.3 it is necessary

In conclusion , it is necessary to reflect the main provisions of the final qualification work and formulate general conclusions.

The application includes…

4. Initial data for WRC:

Main literature:

Additional literature:

Head of WRC: ________________/_________________

signature transcript

The student received the task: “____” ______________ 201____.

Student: ________________________/___________________

signature transcript

*

Annex 4. List of compliance with the implementation of WRC methodological recommendations.

No. Requirements Compliant (+) Does not match (-) Student’s signature
one. WRC is handed over to the dean’s office in hardcover.
2. The text is formatted to fit the full width of the page.
3. The body text font is Times New Roman. Font – 14. Red line – 1.5.
4. Field sizes: left – 30 mm; right – 10 mm; top -20 mm; lower – 20 mm.
5. Line spacing – 1.5.
6. The number of pages in the WRC, excluding Annexes, corresponds to the Methodological Recommendations: from 60 to 75 pages.
7. Chapters start on a new page. Chapter titles are in the middle of the page. Title font-16, bold, line spacing – 1.
eight. Sections of the chapters are made sequentially in solid text. The title of the section is in the middle of the page. Font-14, bold, line-spacing-1.
nine. All WRC pages are numbered. The numbering starts from the Content with a serial number, taking into account the Title Page and the Task.
ten. The sequence of the WRC pages is observed: § Title page (indicating the Code of the Specialty, the topic on which the WRC was carried out; § The assignment for the implementation of the WRC, received from the head at the first meeting; § Content; § Introduction; § All Chapters; § Conclusion; § List of uses . Literature § Applications § Last sheet of the WRC.
eleven. The electronic version is available on the last spread of the cover.
12. The numbering of tables and graphs (separately for tables and graphs) is done in a continuous order. The word “Table”, “Graph”, “Diagram” and its serial number (without the number sign) are written on top of the table itself on the right side. Font bold, 12, Verdana, line spacing -1.
thirteen. The table title is in the top middle. Font bold, 12, Verdana, line spacing – 1.
fourteen. The text of the column and row names is in bold in the middle of the column or row, the text in the columns is formatted to fit the width of the column. Font bold, 11, Verdana, line spacing – 1.
fifteen. The text of the Table is designed in size 11, Verdana font, line spacing – 1.
sixteen. The name of the Figures is framed at the bottom of the figure in the middle. Font bold, 12, Verdana, line spacing – 1.
17. The schedule for the implementation of the WRC, the review of the head, the compliance sheet, the protocol for checking for anti-plagiarism are in the files and are attached to the WRC
eighteen. Signatures of the student and the leader are available on: the schedule for the implementation of the WRC; title page; on the Task; on the last sheet (student only); on the compliance sheet.
nineteen. Feedback from the head and the electronic version of the WRC are available

Approved by: Head (signature)

*Together with the execution schedule, supervisor’s review, protocol of verification in the “Anti-plagiarism” system and the electronic version, it is included in a separate file in the WRC

Appendix 5

REVIEW

for graduate work

on the topic __________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Student(s)_______________________________________________

Direction (number of specialty) “… (name of specialty)”

Reviewer_________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

(Surname, name, patronymic, academic degree, title, position, place of work)

The review should address the following questions:

1. The relevance of the topic of the final qualifying work.

2. Rationality of the work structure.

3. The degree of achievement of the goals and objectives of the study

4. Quality of material processing.

5. Compliance of the content and design of the work with the requirements.

6. Evaluation of the nature of the work (level of creativity, descriptive nature).

7. Validity of conclusions, suggestions.

8. Theoretical and practical significance of the study.

9. Shortcomings identified in the work (mandatory).

10. The level of development of the competencies specified in the program of the final state certification.

11. Conclusion on the possibility of awarding qualifications with the rationale for the assessment on a five-point system (mandatory).

The review is certified by the seal of the organization in which the reviewer works.

Reviewer______________ _______________

(signature) (full name)

MP

Appendix 6

REVIEW

for graduate work

on the topic __________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Student(s)_______________________________________________

Direction (number of specialty) “… (name of specialty)”

Supervisor_______________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

(Last name, first name, patronymic, academic degree, title, position)

Feedback should include the following questions:

1. Characteristics of the work in terms of its relevance and reality of implementation in production. It should be noted whether the topic is part of the state budget, economic contract or search work of the department, scientific or industrial organization.

2. A short list of the main issues considered in the final qualification work, indicating the degree of depth of presentation. It is advisable to indicate the ratio in the volumes of individual parts of the work and the degree of their significance.

3. The main advantages of the work, indicating the degree of independence of the student in making individual decisions.

4. The main shortcomings of the work.

5. Characteristics of the student’s preparedness for independent research work

6. Evaluation of the student’s work during the period of work.

7. Conclusion on the possibility of awarding a qualification to a student.

Supervisor:______________ ________________

(signature) (full name)

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.